Milwaukee Professionals Association LLC Invoked Atonement & Reparation identify the charter officers as culprits in high incarceration and recidivism in Milwaukee

Top, L-R:  Mayor Tom Barrett, Ald. Joe Dudzik, ex-Ald. & Common Council President Willie Hines, Ald. & Common Council President Michael Murphy, Ald. Milele Coggs; RIGHT - Down:  Ald. Jose Perez, Ald. Jim Bohls, Ald. Nik Kovac; LEFT - Down:  Ald. Bob Donovan, Ald. Willie Wade, Ald. Bob Bauman; Bottom L - Right: Ald. Ashanti Hamilton, Ald. Bob Puenta, Ald. Tony Zielinski, Ald. Terry Witkowski and Ald. Joe Davis

City Center Milwaukee | Day 81 | It is important that the public square is aware of who is in office and responsible for the 19-plus years of mismanagement, appearance of fraud and the act of recidivism in the 4-Phase North Avenue Commerce Center fiasco - Boldt Development, Irgens Development and Sisters of Assisi St. Ann Center.  

The fiasco failed to provide promised employment and business development to help curb the spiraling decline of employment for heads of household and families in the densely populated neighborhoods of the city of Milwaukee. 


Ethics in behavior and commitment to due process to avoid disenfranchisement of the Amani and nearby contiguous neighbors that were known areas of need as evident by the name on the document signed by the City Plan Commission - Central City Industrial Jobs Bank - of the city of Milwaukee as well as all the fingerprints involved by our city charter officers during the implementation or promised implementation of the 4-phase North Avenue Commerce Center.
=====================================================================

WI State Statute 66.46
(e) At least 30 days before adopting a resolution under par. (gm), holding of a public hearing by the planning commission at which interested parties are afforded a reasonable opportunity to express their views on the proposed project plan. The hearing may be held in conjunction with the hearing provided for in par. (a). Notice of the hearing shall be published as a class 2 notice, under ch. 985. The notice shall include a statement advising that a copy of the proposed project plan will be provided on request. Prior to such publication, a copy of the notice shall be sent by 1st class mail to the chief executive officer or administrator of all local governmental entities having the power to levy taxes on property within the district and to the school board of any school district which includes property located within the proposed district. For any county with no chief executive officer or administrator, this notice shall be sent to the county board chairperson.

f) Adoption by the planning commission of a project plan for each tax incremental district and submission of the plan to the local legislative body. The plan shall include a statement listing the kind, number and location of all proposed public works or improvements within the district or, to the extent provided in sub. (2) (f) 1. k., outside the district, an economic feasibility study, a detailed list of estimated project costs, and a description of the methods of financing all estimated project costs and the time when the costs or monetary obligations related thereto are to be incurred. The plan shall also include a map showing existing uses and conditions of real property in the district; a map showing proposed improvements and uses in the district; proposed changes of zoning ordinances, master plan, if any, map, building codes and city ordinances; a list of estimated nonproject costs; and a statement of the proposed method for the relocation of any persons to be displaced. The plan shall indicate how creation of the tax incremental district promotes the orderly development of the city. The city shall include in the plan an opinion of the city attorney or of an attorney retained by the city advising whether the plan is complete and complies with this section.

(g) Approval by the local legislative body of a project plan prior to or concurrent with the adoption of a resolution under par. (gm). The approval shall be by resolution which contains findings that the plan is feasible and in conformity with the master plan, if any, of the city.

(gm) Adoption by the local legislative body of a resolution which:

66.46(4)(gm)1.

Describes the boundaries, which may, but need not, be the same as those recommended by the planning commission, of a tax incremental district with sufficient definiteness to identify with ordinary and reasonable certainty the territory included therein. The boundaries shall include only those whole units of property as are assessed for general property tax purposes. Property standing vacant for an entire 7-year period immediately preceding adoption of the resolution creating a tax incremental district may not comprise more than 25% of the area in the tax incremental district, unless the tax incremental district is suitable for industrial sites under subd. 4. a. and the local legislative body implements an approved project plan to promote industrial development within the meaning of s. 66.52. In this subdivision, "vacant property" includes property where the fair market value or replacement cost value of structural improvements on the parcel is less than the fair market value of the land. In this subdivision, "vacant property" does not include property acquired by the local legislative body under ch. 32 or property included within the abandoned Park East freeway corridor or the abandoned Park West freeway corridor in Milwaukee county.

=====================================================================

The document signed by the City Plan Commission of the city of Milwaukee, prepared by the Department of City Development Urban Design, in confirmation with the provisions of Section 66.46, Wisconsin statutes as amended November 15, 1993  titled:  Project Plan for Tax Incremental District Number 21 - City of Milwaukee (Central City Industrial Jobs Bank).

The many participants and persons of interest - elected-appointed-hired individuals, and organizations that were involved in the assembly, packaging, funding, citizen participation, signing-off and final approval of/for the city of Milwaukee for all aspects of Tax Incremental District 21.  

This includes any and all funding and construction of the four (4) phases of the North Avenue Commerce Center during the 19-plus years.

The companies zoned as for-profit and non-profit are:

• Boldt Construction

• Irgens Construction

• Sisters of Assisi St. Ann

For this reporting, we will look at all ELECTED charter officers in place for the Sisters of Assisi St. Ann Center lack of vetting and give-away.  During the City Planning sign-off for Tax Incremental District 21, present Alderman - 10th District and Common Council President Michael Murphy were present and approving on November 15, 1993.

Officers

2-01. Officers of City. The officers of said city shall be a mayor, one alderman from each ward, constituting a common council, a city ward, constituting a common council, a city treasurer, a city comptroller, a city attorney, a city clerk, commissioner of public works, a city engineer, a commission er of assessments, district assessors, a board of commissioners of the public debt, commissioner of health, a chief of police, one chief engineer of the fire department, one or more harbor masters, 3 inspectors of election for each ward or election precinct and as many firemen, policemen and such other officers and agents as may be provided for by ch. 184, L. 1874, or as the common council may from time to time direct

(HISTORY: Ch. Ord. 310, File #64-4089,

Apr. 6, 1965.