Shelby County, AL v. Holder Supreme Court Oral Argument
Washington, DC
Wednesday, February 27, 2013
The Supreme Court heard oral argument Wednesday on a key provision in the landmark Voting Rights Act of 1965. The Court will decide if Section 5 of the Act has outlived its purpose and imposes an undue burden on states that are subject to federal supervision under the law. Section 5 requires certain states, mainly in the South, get approval from the Justice Department or the DC District Court before changing any voting laws. The case is Shelby County, Alabama v. Holder.
Updated: 1 hr., 9 min. ago
==================
Oral Argument - CLICK
==================
Supreme Court Justices Biographies - CLICK
This blog seeks changes at the NEIGHBORHOOD-LEVEL by a Call for transparency and accountability of ALL who are elected-appointed-volunteered and hired. WE encourage Citizen-Centered engagement, leadership and decision making. We value Principle-Centered Leadership that practices day-to-day Code of Conduct to maximize all government spending, respectful of civil-human-legal rights. It was created on June 3, 2010, with the thought that if I want it to be, it starts and end with me.
WELCOME
CLICK "Subject" - HOME, All Hands on Deck, etc.
- Founder, Chair-CEO-Chief Visionary Officer- MARY GLASS
- AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT - ARPA
- ALL HANDS on DECK
- E-SPECIFIC & MPA LLC Journal Online Edition
- RESPECT-4-RESPECT
- MEMBERSHIP
- TINN 100 - DIAMONDS in the ROUGH
- Re-Define-Re-Brand-Un-trap
- Open for Business
- MPA LLC CONSUMER PRO
- Cheer
- PRESS
- Investment
- PULSE
- DUE DILIGENCE
- Work Challenged
- OUR "CONFERENCE CALENDAR" PUSH PAGE
- PUSH. PUSH. PUSH. 'The Scout' Reporter - E Q U I T Y I N C L U S I O N
- I N D I V I S I B L E - Milwaukee (The Hub)
Search This Blog
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.